Modern Superstitions

First of all I like to mention that the idea behind inventing the superstitions – regardless of the system they invented inside of it – is to use people beliefs as their own slavery chains. Due to this fact, we can see that a modern society can have its own superstitions too. When people don’t know much about their religion, priests can invent more and more tales and add them to the religion and after a long time replace the basic facts of the religion by their own damned tales.
In a modern society strategy owner, states, philosophers and sociologists can invent more and more superstitions and feed people and like the previous case turn the people to addicts of those hobbits and beliefs again. On the other side, lack of awareness can cause even more serious problems in both cases. When people choose to be blind, when they choose to be slaves instead of free men, they feed themselves with misconceptions and misunderstandings instead of facts, whether those facts come from their religion or a specific philosophical system. Avant-gardes in modernizing the third world countries always suggest an enforced renaissance:

"We got to kick out the religion and its superstitions. It worked well in Europe so long ago."

All right! Kick out then, but be aware of not to substitute the old superstitions with new ones. Every time a new religion came to Iran, past time beliefs and traditions penetrated to the core of the brand new religion. If we consider the historic tradition – what is the core of any worthy sociological theory – we find out that the disaster always happened so far by such avant-gardism. If you want to kick out the superstitions you can purify the religion itself. Suggest people to think about what they already have. It's a crime to undermine the old traditional values and not to let the science to create new values based on the new world order suggested by north; otherwise you destructed the whole society. Also spoke Dewey.

Look at Japan as a good example of what happens by enforcing our desired renaissance:
70 percent out of their movie industry products are pornographic movies it also has the highest rate of suicide commitments in the world. Look at South Korea, their presidential candidates are directly suggested by WTO and ought to follow their policies and guidelines.
On the other side the south west Asia and also Latin America suffered more than these for instance the credit provided by IMF to prevent the economical collapse of UK government in 1976 was about 4 Billion USD. In 1994 this amount raised to 48 Billion USD for Mexico and 3 years after reached 60 Billion USD for South Korea. These countries are well known to our avant-gardes as progressing economical giants. After the world accepted the turn off to New World Order suggested by north and started modernizing the third world, the results were very interesting to review: from 1960 to 1991 the share of very rich personalities raised from 70% of worldwide income to 85%. The pure value of income for only 385 men of the richest was equal to that of 2.3 Billion poor men. This period was the time to modernizing whether optional or by enforcing the same economical policies by IMF and WTO. In Indonesia modernizing by those policies enforced by Korean fairs resulted in such a disaster:

"The boss calls us dogs, pigs or whores this is what happens every day. We work from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. Our income is less than 2 USD a day (60 USD a month. less than 600,000 Rls.) We always have to stay for extra work time often extended to 9 p.m. By this extra work we can earn 10 cents per day. We live in a 2*3 meters room for 16 USD a month. 2 liters of water cost 10 cents and we have to pay 1.5 USD each day for the worst kind of food to survive."
(Source: IOC. cit. The Communist Manifesto Now, Socialist Register, 1998)

People think that if the world's leading economical powers are against our modernizing will then we can do it by ourselves! (That's the most ridiculous idea I have ever heard because their benefit is to just modernizing us to turn our whole nations to their own slaves as they has done in those mentioned regions.) You've just raw resources to sell out as national treasures or you have to invent the technology required to process the raw material into valuable goods. You have to start over from their industrial revolution to invent your own technology. They will not borrow that to you for free my independent friends! Even worst you've to start over from their 13th century!

In brief, modernizing the third world has been a disaster both in cultural and industrial fields. If we do not accept this damned progress we will be called uncivilized and barbarous.
The modern western civilization is based on slavery and stealing third world resources and not kicking out the religion. Religious beliefs in US have never been so tight during recent centuries.

We'll discuss more on this issue in our next posts.

Sex and Capitalism II - Feminism

Human rights in third world countries always function as pressure tools to isolate their respected nations by so called public opinion if they decide to get wild against any local or global profit of WTO and its policies all around the world. This process is entirely independent of the governing regime. Domestic pressures have to apply, not to pressurize the governing state, but to challenge people beliefs and turn them to a form that can accept Sex Tourism and Prostitution as normal economical tools and even participate in these trades with a clear conscience. When they face a society in which prostitution and sex business are traditionally taboos, they destroy the origins of that tradition by every means they can.

Feminism founded to guarantee the equal rights for women with those of men. This movement extended itself to known human right facts and then became the main arguing issue in debates of the third world especially in Muslim countries. Feminists of Muslim countries challenge public opinion and even government to force them to accept the values of what they call the modern world.

Prostitution is one of these issues. Feminists are against illegal traffic of women and children by any means. They are against any social phenomena like prostitution caused by poor economical conditions, but if prostitution can freely be chosen by any woman they say that it’s a normal right for every woman to be a prostitute if she wants and nobody can interfere her work except for providing proper health conditions to prevent disease (by recent studies more than 90% of sex workers have to continue their job by any means.). Everything is just alright! You can choose to be a prostitute by yourself. It's your right. Everybody is happy. But carefully look what is undermined by this "right"? The entire society will socially accept prostitution that was the most shameful job of all times, as an honorable job. If it resists, the whole nation, its government, its religion and beliefs will be called uncivilized and against humanity and the whole nation may face global restrictions and might be accused of violation of human rights. This will not be done just by the heads of WTO and their governing media. This time domestic pressure applies itself to undermine the traditions. People accuse those who cannot believe in this propaganda: uncivilized, religious and barbarous.

Feminism teachings also provide the social bed for undermining marriage. This belief directly increases sex costumers and spreads prostitution as well. Illegal traffic was once against humanity; now, how about legal traffic? They are happy to be prostitutes and they will be even happier if they can "work" in those areas that can provide them more social right and security, money and more costumers. They are free workers so they can choose were to work. This has been established in any country that had sold its religion and traditions before to be called civilized. So they migrate to countries with those satisfactory conditions. The more they migrate to a specific region the more its Sex Tourism will grow. Hotels, airlines, restaurants and many others benefit very well. These regions already exist in our world. Look at Thailand, Dubai, Philippine and other sexual and "hot" regions for the most important examples. Governments can provide even more and more policies that make it easy for anyone to migrate to those countries or regions – otherwise they will be accused to restrict their free women and violating the WTO policies - but do not forget that they want their own share of cake! These workers if remain in their countries can make money for the state, why the governing regime allow them to migrate without leaving a penny?

So, the legal traffic will be planned by governments to reserve their rights in this huge trade. Governing regimes has no moral boundaries to limit the trade to legal ways. Now those free women chosen to be prostitutes will tread simply as goods and new raw resources. Importing and exporting women will be the direct results of the growing wave of feminism in Muslim countries.